Humans Cause Global Warming Essay Example for Free

Humans Cause Global Warming Essay Today we are debating the important topic of global warming. As the affirmative team, we strongly believe that global warming is caused by the actions of humans. But this is not just a belief, this is a fact. Global warming, by definition, is a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the earths atmosphere generally attributed to the greenhouse effect caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide, CFCs, and other pollutants. The greenhouse effect is the trapping of the suns warmth in a planets lower atmosphere due to the greater transparency of the atmosphere to visible radiation from the sun than to infrared radiation emitted from the planets surface. In simpler terms, this means that the pollution emitted from the earth, such as the gasses from factories, cars etc. enter the atmosphere and the co2 from these gases absorb the heat from the sun and intern warms the climate. The pollution or carbon dioxide enter the Earths atmosphere and absorb heat from the sun, heating the environment, therefore an increase in co2 means an increase in heat, this resulting in bigger problem for global warming. The main producer of this pollution and greenhouse gases are ofcourse humans, our environment and climate are the ones that have to pay for the humanly actions causing global warming. Scientists have determined that a number of human activities are contributing to global warming by adding excessive amounts of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. These gases such as carbon dioxide (co2) accummulate in the atmosphere and trap heat that normally would exit into outer space. The main source of excess greenhouse gases is the human use of fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels to generate energy for example driving cars, using electricity from coal-fired power plants, or heating homes with oil or natural gas, humans release carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere. Over 100 years ago the co2 level was 35% less than it is currently and since the beginning of the industrial revelution, has been increasing gradually. Nowadays modern society is producing more co2 and other gases than ever before, this being the result of the economic problem, with humans having unlimited wants and needs that can only be produced in a way that influences global warming. (Figure 1) Another significant source of greenhouse gases is deforestation, this is because fewer trees means less carbon dioxide conversion to oxygen. (Figure 2)Deforestation in rainforests add more co2 to the atmosphere than the sum total of most vehicles on roads. In fact 25-30%,of the gases released into the atmosphere each year is a result of deforestation. The reason that logging is so bad for the climate is that when trees, which are 50 percent carbon, are burned or felled they release the carbon they are storing into the air, where it mingles with greenhouse gases from other sources and contributes to global warming. As humans, we do not take our actions into precaution and many of us act before thinking. This is the same situation with global warming and because of this, the result is negative. Global warming affects not only our climate but the environment and air mankind needs for survival, however how can us humans survive when we are the ones destroying our planet and risking our own lives. Greenhouse gases can stay in the atmosphere for an amount of years ranging from decades to hundreds or thousands of years. No matter what we do, global warming is going to have some effect on Earth. These effects range from diseases and economic consquences to different types of hazzards. (Figure 3) Floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, they are all weathering patterns that are directly altered by the differences in temperature. Most of them are occuring due to high sea level or heavy rainfall. This was seen in 2004 and 2005. (Figure 4) It can be a devastating shock for crops and other agriculture, and also bring death and injury to humans and animals through accidents, hypothermia and starvation. It may seem illogical at first to attribute harsher cold weather to global warming, but a change in atmospheric patterns brought about by receding glacial ice can lead to the redirection of polar air currents and the suns rays being absorbed by the larger areas of dark blue sea. However this process can also be reversed to achieve opposite results. (Figure 5) Some areas suffer serious droughts and heat waves and the severity of these hazzards are increasing by large numbers. Countries such as Africa and India recieve the worst of these affects, since water is already a dangerous rare essential. (Figure 6) As the planet continues to become warmer and warmer as global warming increases and the dry lands that are already susceptible to wildfires are likely to be ravaged by even more frequent and destructive episodes. In 2007, more than 3,000 fires brought destruction to Southeastern Europe thanks to a long summer that created arid and parched conditions, a situation that would become normal as a consequence of the greenhouse effect. As countries warm, disease carrying insects migrate, bringing their diseases with them. Climate greatly influences some of the most deadly and widespread diseases currently affecting millions of people across the world with the spread of diseases like Malaria, West Nile virus and Dengue fever to parts of the planet. With greatly reduced rainfall, more severe droughts and loss of soil fertility, food and water supplies would soon diminish, resulting in higher prices, famine, disease, malnutrition, starvation and, ultimately, death. These effects spell one thing for the countries of the world: economic consequences. Hazzards cause billions of dollars in damage, diseases cost money to treat and control and conflicts aggravate all of these. There is simply no other mechanism that can explain the significantly altered climate path and the changes in the radiative forcing other than human causes. Animals are a major source that are affected by the influences of global warming, some not only lose their habitat and homes, but also suffer in the drastic measures that humans have put them up against. Animals such as polar bears and penguins are the most obvious evidence of consequences of having warmer climates. (Figure 7) They and other animals that are dependent on cold enviornments retreat to more northerly locations as the planet heats up, leading to encroachment upon other eco-systems and displacement of other animals from their natural habitat. Animals that are driven from their natural habitats or normal migration routes by environmental factors could easily come into contact with human settlements, leading to many deaths among humans and already endangered animals. (Figure 8) The world’s oceans absorb roughly 30% of all carbon dioxide that seeps into the atmosphere, and so inevitably, as more gases are released, ocean life will continue to suffer the negative consequences placed upon them by human actions.

To Kill a Mocking Bird - Maturation Essay -- essays research papers

â€Å"Growing Together† The way and rate that people mature at can be directly attributed to the values and beliefs of the society that surrounds an individual. It is undeniable that society’s perspective on many controversial issues will generally be adopted by the younger generations in a given society. Moreover, the exposure to significant events, coupled with the major influence of family members, can have an enormous impact on how an individual matures. Additionally, family members greatly help each other develop into moral adults by instilling in each other values that will ultimately determine an individual’s character. In Harper Lee’s timeless classic, To Kill a Mockingbird, the constant reiteration of Atticus Finch’s values, in conjunction with the exposure to significant events, assist in Jem and Scout’s maturation into virtuous adolescents. Throughout the novel, Atticus’ assistance to Jem and Scout’s development becomes evident. Atticus takes every opportunity to attempt to teach his children the importance of having an open-mind. For instance, when Scout queries Atticus about Maycomb’s prejudice perspective, he tells her, â€Å"You never really understand a person until†¦you climb in their skin and walk around in it.† (Lee 30) Even during the early stages of the novel, it is apparent that Atticus endeavors to instill the values of empathy and tolerance within Jem and Scout by teaching them how to have multiple perspectives on a situation. In addition, Atticus also attempts to enlighten his children about peaceful resolution in society. For example, when Atticus is chosen to defend Tom Robinson, Atticus tells Scout, you might hear some ugly talk about it at school but†¦you just hold your head high and keep those fists down.†... ...heme of maturation in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, is conveyed through the characters of Scout and Jem, in conjunction with the assistance of their virtuous father Atticus Finch. Early in the novel, Atticus ascertains himself as a major facilitator in the maturation process of Scout and Jem by incessantly providing mature solutions to his children’s predicaments. Moreover, Scout, a major benefactor of the Boo Radley incident and Atticus’ wisdom, has helped her develop into a very tolerant and mature individual. Undeniably, Jem’s remarkable development into a broadminded and compassionate character can be directly attributed to Atticus’ kindness and Jem’s exposure to the Tom Robinson trial. In synopsis, it is evident that the individuals and social circumstances that surround an individual play a major role in defining the type of individual one will become.

The Failure Of War By Wendell Berry

Wendell Berry, in his essay ‘The Failure of War,’ claims that ‘modern war does not work as a solution to any problem except retribution,’ and that it promotes a vicious cycle of violence and other social problems. Supporters for war will claim that war answers the dilemma of national defense. But the agnostic, in return, will solicit to what level the cost even of a triumphant war of national defense—in life, wealth, material, foods, health, and liberty—may amount to a national overwhelm. National defense by way of war constantly entails some quantity of national defeat. Militarization in defense of freedom downsizes the freedom of the apologists. There is a crucial contradiction between war and freedom.In a contemporary war, fought with modern armaments and on the modern scale, neither side can bound to â€Å"the adversary† the harm that it does. These wars ruin the humanity. Modern war has not only made it unworkable to kill â€Å"opp onents† without massacring â€Å"non-warriors,† it has made it ineffectual to destroy your foe without spoiling yourself. Modern wars have usually been fought to end war; they have been fought for the sake of peace.To Berry most appalling weapons have been prepared, seemingly, to maintain and assure the peace of the world. â€Å"All we want is peace,† we utter as we increase inexorably our aptitude to make war. Yet in the last part of a century in which we have fought two combats to end war and numerous more to prevent war and keep peace, and in which scientific and hi-tech evolution has made war ever more horrifying and less manageable, we still, by policy, confer no contemplation to nonviolent approach of national defense. We stick to the discouraging paradox of making peace by producing war.Capital chastisement sinks us all to the same level of primal aggression, at which an act of brutality is rebuked by another deed of aggression. What the justifiers of thes e feats overlook is the fact—fixed by the history of quarrels; steer clear of the history of war—that belligerence raises violence. Operations of violence committed in â€Å"fairness† or in assertion of â€Å"rights† or in resistance of â€Å"peace† do not impede violence. They set up and justify its prolongation.The most hazardous fallacy of the parties of violence is the notion that endorsed violence can put off or control illegal violence. If we devote to these small irrationalities the enormity of worldwide relations, we make, predictably, a few much larger idiocies. In â€Å"foreign† wars, we do not explicitly experience the harm that we wreak upon the rival. We pay monies to sanction the war, but that is nothing new, for we shell out war levies in era of peace as well.Quite the reverse, war is the great solution and opening of our corporate economy, which keeps going and prospers upon war. And thus great costs are engrossed in our fixa tion on war, but the overheads are â€Å"externalized† as â€Å"tolerable losses.† Romantic separatists, which are to say most protectors for war, always contain in their public speeches mathematics or an accounting of war. The supportable price, at last, is suchlike is paid.It is straightforward to see the likeness between this accounting of the cost of war and our normal accounting of the price of improvement. Now with less fret (to date) it is observed world subjugation by global capitalism. Nevertheless its political means are milder than those of Leninism, this lately internationalized capitalism may attest even more harsh to human mores and communities, of liberty, and of environment. To Berry people would be less incongruous if the leaders would believe in good faith the verified surrogates to violence.

Creation of Victor - Frankenstein - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1730 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? Question1 We learn that he is a professional performer who is capable of entertaining his audience. His work is to motivate his audiences to utilize writing processes. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Creation of Victor Frankenstein" essay for you Create order Question 2 Whats the point of the frame narrative? Why do we begin and end with Robert Walton? Does he learn a lesson from his encounter with Frankenstein? If so, what is it? Question 3 I think the narrator Victor Frankenstein is unreliable narrator due to the fact that his point of view in the story and the events that unfolded are based on the terms of self-interest, specifically moral validation on his actions. Question 4 Victor Frankenstein likes the works of science and he dislikes situations that he can’t help himself. Question 6 He created him so human in form because of Frankenstein, is a man driven to learn and to experiment. That is all well and good, but, unfortunately for Victor Frankenstein, the particular subject of his obsession is the reanimation of dead tissue. In short, Victor is determined to prove that the dead can be brought back to life. He abandoned his creation. Victor states, Unable to endure the aspect of the being I created, I rushed out of the room. As the text continues, the Creature finds Victor, and mumbling, Victor runs away again. Victors hostile and negative reaction toward the Creature was simply because the Creature did not look like or turn out as Victor had imagined. Question 7 Victor, as the creator had the responsibility to care for the monster (he did not), and to keep it from harm and harming others (he didnt), as well as helping it to understand itself and educating it (he doesnt do this either). Victor abandons the creature because he is horrified at what he has done. Question 8 Victor Frankenstein is the one that created the monster. The things that the creature does to the people he loves would not have happened were it not that he created the creature. For instance, the monster kills Victors wife during their honeymoon. I don’t think that there is anything missing that Victor should feel responsible of. Justine and Elizabeth do feel they have responsibilities. For instance, it’s the responsibility of Elizabeth to keep the family together after Caroline dies. Justine feels the responsibility of being the most grateful little creature in the world; and, of course, shes very clever and gentle, and extremely pretty. She has the responsibility of taking care of this beauty. Question 9 If you are afraid to tell the people you love about the project you got, it is simply because you are afraid they won’t be able to accept it and one is afraid of panic that comes thereafter. Question 10 The author brings tries to create a vivid image of the creature in the reader’s mind by describing him as having a figure which resembles that of a man. The creature was also said to be moving at a very high speed. According to the dislike and mockery which the creature faces from the people, he is likely to look very scary and different from the normal human beings. However, the author describes his eloquence in speech meaning that he is not evil. Question 11 When comparing Victor and the creature, Victor seems to be more rational since he is able to give the creature a chance to narrate his tale. Victor also seems to be more compassionate than the creature since he says that he should have given the creature a chance to be happy before he rendered the creature as evil. Between the two, the creature seems to be more virtuous than Victor since the creature is able to humble himself down in order to convince Victor to hear him out. However, Victor seems to be more emotional since he wanted to express his anger on the creature by fighting him yet the creature had not attacked Victor. Question 12 The creature is said to be very kind and compassionate especially with the De Lacey family. The creature has also made an effort to learn the language spoken by the De Lacey family as well as a brief history of Europe. When the creature left Ingolstadt, he lacked knowledge of his surrounding as well as himself. Currently, he has become learned and has familiarized with his environment and his being from seeing his image in a reflection. He is scared of his outward appearance and more so the idea that the human beings would not accept him when he practically presented himself. Victor had thought of him as evil but the creature appears to be good and virtuous where he even stops stealing food from the De Lacey family and starts helping them out. At this point, he appears to be too virtuous to have murdered anyone. Question 13 The creature questioned his origin and the reason why he did not fit into the society. The question is important to the reader since it shows that the creature has come to understand his environment and himself. Question 14 Humanity originated from God and that humans can mate but the creature cannot mate with humans since they are not of the same species. Question 15 Humans did not appreciate the creature and treated him with injustice such as where he was short for saving a girl’s life. Question 16 Victor does not like the idea of creating a mate for the creature but is enslaved by the condition given by the creature if he failed whereby the creature could kill his whole family. Question 17 The creature felt as if he was in an equal position with his creator and the idea that he could make demands made everything appear fair to him after being treated with so much injustice by the humans. Question 18 The creature is seen to be filled with rage in a case where Victor refuses to give in to his demands. Therefore, the creature is likely to destroy Victor and his family. Question 19 Victor believes that he had drawn a horrible curse upon his head since he had agreed to create the monster a mate and later decided to destroy the experiment before he was done. This angered the monster and he knew that he and the monster would live fighting. Question 20 Victor calls the monster a devil for the murders by the monster of Victor’s family members as well as his newly wedded wife. The monster had turned into an evil being unlike before. Question 21 What makes the monster monstrous is the â€Å"flowing black hair and white teeth juxtaposed with his shriveled face and straight black lips. Question 22 Victor’s final words are harsh. This means that he is upset just the way a normal human being can. The monster final words are angry yet forgiving. The words were a way of showing Victor how much he has suffered in the human life. The similarities in Walton and in the letters as a foil character is that they both contribute to the Frankenstein character and they are strong as well and they both old desires. Essay (option c) God is missing in Frankenstein and this is evident in the fact that no one has mentioned God in the entire book. If God and faith had entered the creature’s life, a lot could have changed. This is because God would become part of his development and faith that comes from God would change and above all, support humanity through all the struggles that he or she goes through. When God enters into the life of a creature, a lot of changes. This is where a creature becomes part of Christ and if a creature is in Christ, then a new creature is formed. The connections that are in the soul changes towards doing good. The changes that take place when God enters the life of a creature, a lot of changes in terms of the meaning that the creation holds. A creation becomes a joint with God. This is because, in creation, an expression of Gods own life is represented. Therefore, the non-expression of Gods own being are eliminated. It’s after this when now the life of faith comes in a creature. A creature that has no faith does not please God. For a creature to believe that there is God, a sense of faith must apply. God requires faith from a creation as this is the only way a creation can walk in the ways that please him. In the commandments, for instance, God says that a creature should first believe in him. Acknowledging God and the truth in him is therefore paramount. It is by faith a creation knows that the Lord is God and that he is he that made us and not ourselves. A creation also understands that we are his and that we become the sheep of his own pasture. With this, it is clear that if a creature is the work of God, then God is the one that is responsible for its development. A creature does not, therefore, find itself in moments of struggle that concern this life. This is because God sustains a creation. For instance, since he is the radiance of his own glory and an exact representation of his own nature, he, therefore, upholds all the things by the power that he has. The ordinances of heaven, where is the home of God, by the lifting of the eyes by a creature, the abundance of waters end up covering it. It is the will of God to do whatever that he pleases. It is the will of God for any creature to do what is right. The monster in Frankenstein does a lot of evil things. This simply means that God is not in the monster and all the evil things the monster does are not in accordance with the will of God. For instance, it is the will of God that one should not kill, however, we see the monster killing even the people who are very close to the person that made it. In reference to paradise lost, such acts are satanic. With God, a creation stands a position of overcoming Satan’s temptations. For instance, God sends his own angels to strengthen his creatures to help them distinguish what is right and bad for them. A creature, therefore, struggles no more with this life.